Social Media Tribalism and New Social Movements: The Case of Gezi Park Protests in Turkey

Friday, March 14, 2014
Hampton (Omni Shoreham)
B. Aysuda Kolemen , Istanbul Kemerburgaz University
In this paper, I examine whether and how social media affects public discourses on protests by focusing on the protests that broke out at Gezi Park, Istanbul, Turkey in May 2013, and almost instantaneously spread to whole country.  During the protests, protestors employed social media to disseminate real time information, call for support, explain and defend their positions, expose the brutality of the police force against the protestors, and craft a positive, nonviolent image of the protests.

I find that the protestors’ success in controlling the discourses on their movement was quite limited in Turkey.  Due to the high levels of internet tribalism and selective exposure on social media, two diametrically opposed discourses emerged on the protests and many people remained largely unaware of the viewpoint of “the other side.” Rather than facilitating information flow between opposing groups, social media only served to amplify existing political discourses on traditional media, and somewhat paradoxically rendered many people unaware of the other side’s perspective and “facts.”

To explore how the protestors and the anti-protest groups viewed the whole movement, I conducted interviews with five groups of protestors at Gezi Parki, as well as a group of conservative and religious people who were opposed to the protests. I also surveyed two religiously conservative newspapers and two dissident, secular-left newspapers.  Finally, I examined all tweets with Gezi protest-related hashtags during the most intense phase of the protests (May 27-June 30).