Saturday, April 16, 2016
Maestro B (DoubleTree by Hilton Philadelphia Center City)
Much of what we know about attitudes towards immigrants comes from countries that have absorbed multiple waves of migration in the post-war period. However, over the past two decades the geography of migration has changed. Late-developing countries that were long the reserve labor pool for Europe’s core industrial economies are today places of net immigration. How do citizens in a country with a living memory of emigration react to unprecedented levels of immigration? Just as the idea of being a ‘nation of immigrants’ helps shape views about immigration in the U.S., does being a nation of emigrants shape the response to unprecedented levels of immigration in the ‘new destination’ countries of Western Europe? And if this is indeed the case, how - is it historical memory that matters? Or do people need a more immediate activation of the emigration experience?
This paper investigates the relationship between emigration and attitudes towards immigration by exploring both the geographic and personal contexts of emigration in Ireland, a country that only became a net importer of labor in the 1990s. It first explores the relationship between the geography of emigration and attitudes towards immigration using survey data, county-level population data, and voting records from the 2004 citizenship referendum. Then, using an experimental research design, it will test the effect of emigration-related prompts on individual attitudes towards immigration.