Why Do Seniors Often Chose Family Care? Elderly Care Recipients Between Care Policies and Culture.

Thursday, April 14, 2016
Assembly F (DoubleTree by Hilton Philadelphia Center City)
Birgit Pfau-Effinger , Dept. of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Southern Denmark
Thurid Eggers , Center for Globalisation and Governance, Hamburg University
Christopher Grages , Center for Globalisation and Governance, Hamburg University
In the mid-1990s, many European welfare states have introduced new social rights for senior citizens with care needs to publicly funded care. However, in many welfare states, a relevant part of the seniors who are entitled to receive publicly funded care by care agencies, choose instead care by a family member. The paper aims to answer the question: How is it possible to explain why seniors in part choose family care in spite of the new options to use publicly funded care by agencies?

The theoretical framework it based on the theoretical approach of societal ‘care arrangements’ of Pfau-Effinger (1998, 2004), according to which the behavior of people in need of care in the context of care policies can be explained with the complex and partly incoherent interaction between cultural, institutional, social and economic factors.

The paper introduces findings of an empirical study that analyses the degree to which seniors make use of their right to use public care in the context of different welfare state policies and different cultural ideals about care. It analyses care policies and care structures in 6 European welfare states, based on document analysis, data of different waves of international surveys like SHARE and Eurobarometer, and national data sets.

The findings indicate that a traditional cultural orientation towards family care and discrepancies between the popular definition of a good quality of care in the population and the definition of good care in the concepts of care policies contribute to the explanation of the differences.

Paper
  • CES Culture-Care Policy Pfau-Effinger-Eggers-Grages.pdf (355.1 kB)