The Problematique of Indirect Democracy in Europe

Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Anatomy - Large LT (University of Glasgow)
Hans Keman , Political Science and Public Administration, VU University Amsterdam
The model of indirect democracy shows defects across EUrope. However, Trust in parties, government and its institutions is less than before and Satisfaction with state or EU authorityis low. It appears that political parties are incapable to play the two level game: finding consent and support within the nation and simultaneously within the EU to act. In part this is a result of the institutional incompatibilities between member-states and Brussels, in part due to pressures and problems that require collective and coordinated action.

Hence there is a puzzle for political parties: 1. How to reconcile intra-national perceptions and trans-national pressures? 2. How to play the two level game by finding a consensus within the own polity? 3 ideas are discussed: 1. Changing party types: it is overlooked that New Parties are different in terms of role perception – recruitment – representation. In fact they are people’s movements that use extant institutions to challenge the established political elites. 2. New Parties produce new forms of re-alignment as they are close to societal emotions. 3. Established parties look incapable to solve societal problems, whereas new parties or movements are presenting solutions by exiting the EU.

Instead of an indirect type of Madisonian democracy there is a turn to Jefferson where the traditional political elites are being replaced. This would mean a transformation of party politics in Europe: from concertation among the party elites to confrontation by  ‘people movements’ with national governments and the EU.

Paper
  • Paper CES conference 12 July 2017.docx (109.6 kB)