Occupational Closure and Wage Inequality in Germany and the United Kingdom

Tuesday, June 25, 2013
C2.17 (Oudemanhuispoort)
Thijs Bol , University of Amsterdam/
Kim A Weeden , Cornell University
Rent-based accounts of labor market inequality argue that artificial restrictions on the supply

of labor in an occupation or other labor market position drive up wages in these positions and

thereby contribute to wage inequality. In this article, we develop a theoretical argument to

account for differences in the prevalence and wage effects of occupational closure across

countries and assess its predictions in the United Kingdom (UK), a liberal market economy

(LME), and Germany, a coordinated market economy (CME). Using newly collected

occupation-level data on licensure, educational credentialing, unionization, and

apprenticeships, we show that closure increases mean occupation wages in both countries,

with vocational credentialing and unionization having particularly strong effects in Germany

and tertiary credentialing and licensure having particularly strong effects in the UK. Although

much of the comparative inequality literature focuses on the inequality-reducing labor market

institutions in CMEs and the dearth of such institutions in LMEs, we show that labor markets

in examples of both systems are entirely polluted by rents that contribute to wage inequality.