While both retrenched public paygo schemes, Italy has moved towards a much more individualized system of old age protection, also embarking on a (difficult) transition to a multi-pillar architecture. By contrast, Spain has peculiarly combined cost-containment parametric reforms with some expansionary interventions for selected social groups. This at least until the Euro-crisis imposed harsh austerity measures in both countries – though with different speed in reform implementation – as well as pushed the unions at the margins of pension policymaking.
Against such backdrop, the paper systematically analyzes trade unions’ preferences and strategies in pension reform processes in Italy and Spain with two main goals. On the one hand, it aims at assessing to what extent unions’ preferences were key in shaping pension reforms in the last two decades. On the other, it asks i) whether the Euro-crisis has operated as a “critical juncture” for unions’ preferences in this field, and ii) what strategies workers’ organizations are developing to tackle the risk of irrelevance in pension policymaking after the Great Recession.